Not the animal kind, but the Michael Jackson trial kind. The kind where two sides of the same story spout their version of ‘truth’. The kind where the media wet themselves at all the scandal. The kind where it stands a very good chance that justice will not be done.
I almost can’t stand to watch. I’m not a supporter of Jackson as such, but I also know that it will be very very difficult for this trial to be a fair one.
Jackson himself is in my eyes a tragedy, a victim of his own talents and success. It’s obvious to me (and perhaps everyone else) that he is either very eccentric or bordering on mentally ill. I suspect the latter is closer to the truth, but in this case I’m not entirely sure where the line should be drawn. Does odd behaviour alone count as being mentally ill? I doubt it. But I think living in a perpetual childhood probably does.
I can imagine Jackson being capable of both sides of the coin. I can see him inviting children in to his house, his life, his bedroom, in the same way a lot of kids today have ‘sleep overs’. Given his general mentality I can honestly believe that’s where it stops. Is it normal? Of course not. Is it acceptable? Hell no. But I have to say the question that constantly arises in my mind is ‘why on earth did the parents let their kids stay over?’. I certainly wouldn’t have, no matter how many ‘gifts’ he’d bestowed on my family. My daughter can’t be bought, not by anyone, and least of all by somebody like Jackson.
Of course I don’t discount the possibility that abuse did occur. In this scenario I imagine it’s a very fine line to cross. I really don’t think we’ll ever know the truth on this one. I certainly wouldn’t rely on this trial to tell me the truth.
I hate to think of either party being wronged on this one. I’d hate to think that simply because a guy was deemed odd or mentally ill or whatever, that he was tarred with the wrong brush. But equally I’d hate to think that the voice of an abused child wasn’t heard amidst all the money, fame and fancy lawyers.